Useful information about the World Mission Society Church of God

[False argument]

First, those who slander the Church of God insist that Christ Ahnsahnghong never testified Himself as a Second Coming Christ in His book, “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life,” and that it is quite similar to the book of Mormon.
Second, in the Chapter 4 Moses and Jesus of the book of “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life” published in 1993 is as follows:


They say that here, the words “in the future, a second time” have been deleted in the book published in 2010 so Christ Ahnsahnghong is not the Second Coming Christ and He just took on a role to proclaim the end days as the prophet Elijah.

[Answer]

Now, let’s study why their arguments are wrong.
I have a question for those slanderers though.
Are the Biblical commentaries, which they themselves make up and use, similar to the book of Mormon?
If you have eyes with you, please read the book “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life” correctly. It is clearly testified who the Christ Ahnsahnghong is, all over the book. Nevertheless, they make up the false arguments, saying that there is no evidence that Christ Ahnsahnghong is the Second Coming Christ. This shows that they are evidently the very children of the devil the father of lies (John 8:44). I have many things to show as evidence, but will just mention two things due to the limit of space.
In the chapter 1 of the book “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the water of life,” Christ Ahnsahnghong explained that the secret of the seven thunders is the seven feasts in three times. And at the end of the chapter, he asked, “Who will break the seals and open up what the seven thunders said?” and the He showed Revelation 5:1-6, and wrote as follows:

Since the Lamb is to appear in the last days, it is definitely the Second Coming Christ. Christ Ahnsahnghong testified that the One who would open up the secrets of the seven thunders should be only the Second Coming Christ.
Then, who actually opened the secrets of the seven thunders? He is very Christ Ahnsahnghong who wrote the chapter 1 of the book, “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life.” Would you still insist that there is no evidence that Christ Ahnsahnghong testified Himself as the Second Coming Christ?

Christ Ahnsahnghong testified that the One who brought us back the Passover of the new covenant is the last Melchizedek [Christ], the Second Coming Christ.

There was a clear prophecy (Isa 53) in the Bible that Jesus would be afflicted. Nevertheless, the Jews who crucified Jesus were against Jesus, not knowing such a prophecy but just believing that Christ should be the eternal King. In the same way, slanderers currently insist on their false argument, misusing some specific phrases, without realizing Christ Ahnsahnghong is the Second Coming Christ whom the whole book of “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life” testifies about.

• John 12:34 The crowd spoke up, “We have heard from the Law that the Christ will remain forever, so how can you say, ‘The Son of Man must be lifted up’? Who is this ‘Son of Man’?”

Let’s look at the phrase that they misused.

It is not correct at all to understand “in the future” in the text as the second coming of Christ in the future. In the book, “everything Christ will do in the future,” which we will understand by studying the works of Moses, means everything to be fulfilled by Jesus since His first coming until the last day. For example, Moses’ work of setting the Israelites free through the Passover, represented Jesus’ work of setting God’s people free from the slavery of sin and death through the Passover in the future. In addition, there is much evidence that Moses’ work represented what Jesus would fulfill in the future in chapter 4 of the book, “The Mystery of God and the Spring of the Water of Life.” However, they falsely insist that the words “in the future” mean “in the future after Christ Ahnsahnghong,” and that Christ Ahnsahnghong wrote that Christ would come a second time in the future.
The words “in the future” in the text do not give us confusion at all, but they unreasonably insist, saying, “It means the future after Ahnsahnghong.” This is a definite lie they themselves manipulated, not because they do not know its meaning but because they intend to slander the truth.

Christ Ahnsahnghong clearly testified that “Jesus is not coming right away to make a final judgment but rather, He is to be born in flesh and to recover the truth of the new covenant that was taken away,” and Christ Ahnsahnghong Himself restored all the truth of the new covenant. Then, who must be Christ Ahnsahnghong? Think about it seriously.

(827)